Proposal to Restructure the Australian Government and Governance

View the 51-page PDF report at Proposal-to-Restructure-the-Australian-Government-and-Governance 260712

Readers are invited to email the author with suggested improvements to this draft report. The text below is only the proposal summary. It is suggested that the full text be read before viewing the videos. Then read the text again, viewing the videos that are of particular interest. Note: There is far more vital detail in the body of the report in addition to the summary text below.

Author: Peter Senior.

Email: petersenior42@gmail.com

Summary

The current Labor Australian government and governance performance are widely accepted as working poorly for most Australian people, and this performance is deteriorating rapidly.

This proposal to restructure the Australian government and governance is based on the premise that trying to change substantially the current government within the current governance framework is a fool’s errand. It won’t work; so much needs changing. There are so many problems with the current government and governance that a complete restructure based on fundamental principles and defined changes and outcomes is essential. Minor changes will inevitably get bogged down in a plethora of complexities, obfuscation and entropy – an accelerating fall into orchestrated disorder and entropy.

A fast-growing proportion of Australia’s population is demanding the government fix at least ten key issues: Direct Democracy (albeit not recognised as such), Immigration, Hate Laws, Digital ID, Net-Zero energy plan, Military, Australia Corporation, Paedophiles, Police violence (such as in Victoria during Covid, the recent unprovoked brutality of New South Wales “police” against legitimate peaceful protestors on the streets of Sydney) and corruption. The first 4 have erupted, the other 6 are simmering.

This proposal presents a solution to fix all these failures and problems, and much more. The optimum, most practical approach to implement the proposal would start with a double dissolution. This would be followed by an election with one candidate in each electorate stating publicly that they support this or a similar proposal, and that they will implement it as soon as possible if elected. Will this happen? Not whilst the majority of voters suffer from cognitive dissonance after a lifetime of carefully controlled indoctrination, but check the proposal to overcome this cognitive dissonance below.

The Australian Preferential Voting System has led to results that do not reflect the clear views of voters. For instance, the current Australian government was supported by less than one third of voters – far less now as OneNation leads in the latest polls.  Democracy is not meant to work that way. It will be necessary for a new party, or new coalition, to field candidates in every electorate in the next election to optimise the likelihood of their winning a clear majority. Recall the word Democracy is derived from the Greek Demo, meaning ‘the people’, and Cratos is ‘the power’.

An overriding problem for ‘people power’ is, as is described in several sections of this proposal: what happens when ‘the people’ have been indoctrinated by a lifetime of false information? Will they apply their ‘power’ by supporting the indoctrination?  Probably yes – until something happens to reverse significant parts of this indoctrination. Consider this video explanation: cdn.realaussienews.com.au/2026/05/Democracy-2.mp4

If all these candidates, including those from existing major and minor parties as well as independents, form a new party, join one existing minor party or form a coalition, and then agree to field only one candidate for each electorate, they will likely win a majority in both houses if – and this is a critical ‘if’ – sufficient candidates present a credible proposal for a new government and governance that would deliver far better outcomes for most voters, and voters agree with the proposal after overcoming their cognitive dissonance. So, how could that happen?

There would need to be a new party or coalition whose leaders and all candidates first assess, and then improve, a proposed structure and governance, including a new comprehensive vision, strategy and operational plan that all candidates fully understand and support, and that will convince the majority of voters to vote for a candidate who promises to implement fully the vision, strategy and plan as soon as possible. Convincing a majority of voters will need a very carefully constructed communications plan, as described in this proposal, delivered by a large number of alternative media.  Mainstream media will certainly do everything in their power to obstruct this plan.

This proposal describes 23 changed areas of government and governance, preceded by a vision for the Australian government. All 23 areas and the vision are interconnected and, together, would lead to massive improvements in every aspect of almost all Australians’ lives, to an Australia we can all be proud of, a model for every country in the world to adopt. No timeline is set; just asap.

The 23 areas overarched by the vision are:

• The new Australian Vision will overarch all government action

1. Australia will implement Direct Democracy
2. The Australian Constitution will be reviewed
3. Australia will be neutral
4. The Australian Military will reflect neutrality
5. Councils will take over all state and territory functions
6. All laws will be reviewed for compliance with new governance
7. Elections will be by paper voting forms only with rigorous oversight
8. The government will manage Australian financial affairs             
9. Infrastructure will be fully owned by Australians
10. All taxes will be replaced by a single GST on non-essential items
11. Electricity will be provided at the lowest practical cost
12. Compulsory audits of government and council efficiency & effectiveness
13. Regulations & licences will be reviewed for compliance with governance
14. Immigration will be aligned with planned growth
15. Australia will have short- and long-term growth plans
16. All education will return to the basics and fact-based information
17. Impediments to freedom of speech will be removed
18. All Australian people will be treated as equals
19. Plans for digital ID will be put on hold
20. Councils will pay retirement and welfare benefits
21. All health and related services will be based on proven benefits
22. Environment management will be based on proven benefits to Australians
23. A research group will assess dubious information and publish the results

Every point proposed in the 23 areas could be implemented if the majority of Australians and the government approve them.  It is not a question of ‘it can’t be done’; it can, likely with some improvements to these proposals.  But are enough people and future politicians prepared to stand up and be counted?  To stand up for what is clearly far better for the great majority of them?

However, and this is a critical point, the proposals in the 24 areas cover hundreds of aspects that the great majority of people will either struggle with or initially outright reject because they are contrary to what most people have been taught or, more accurately, indoctrinated for most of their lives; the initial reaction from most people is likely to be they are just too different and require too much thinking and discussion. It will therefore be vital that the new party or coalition understands the full eventual scope of the proposal but introduces some of the interconnected details gradually at a pace that most people can absorb and not be turned off by the sheer enormity and interconnectedness of the proposed changes.

A highly competent and credible Research Group will be established at the earliest opportunity to research all available information on selected topics, form conclusions based on the best evidence available and publish their conclusion, referencing supporting evidence.  It is likely that some of their conclusions will not be published immediately, as it is expected that this would cause too much consternation, even riots. Many of the likely research subjects are described throughout this proposal. A gradual approach to dissemination will be necessary to reverse lifetimes of indoctrination, causing cognitive dissonance in many, possibly most of the Australian population. However, major progress in this reversal process is essential before a proper level of democracy is achieved and the government delivers optimum services to its voters.