Proposal to Restructure the Australian Government and Governance

View the 33-page MS Word report at: Proposal to Restructure the Australian Government and Governance 260224

Readers are invited to email the author with suggested improvements to this draft report. The text below is only the proposal summary. It is suggested that the full text be read before viewing the videos. Then read the text again, viewing the videos that are of particular interest.

Author: Peter Senior.

Email: petersenior42@gmail.com

Summary

This proposal starts by noting that trying to change substantially the current government within the current governance framework is a fool’s errand. It won’t work; so much needs changing. There are so many problems with the current government and governance that a complete restructure based on fundamental principles and defined changes and outcomes is essential. Minor changes will inevitably get bogged down in a plethora of complexities, obfuscation and entropy – an accelerating fall into orchestrated disorder.

A fast-growing proportion of Australia’s population is demanding the government fix at least nine key issues: Direct Democracy (albeit not recognised as such), Immigration, Hate Laws, Digital ID, Net-Zero energy plan, Military, Australia Corporation, Paedophiles, Police violence (such as in Victoria during Covid and the recent unprovoked brutality of New South Wales “police” against legitimate peaceful protestors on the streets of Sydney). The first 3 have erupted, the other 6 are simmering.

This proposal presents a solution to fix all these failures and problems, and much more. The optimum, most practical approach to implement the proposal would start with a double dissolution. This would be followed by an election with one candidate in each electorate stating publicly that they support this or a similar proposal, and that they will implement it as soon as possible if elected. The Australian Preferential Voting System has led to results that do not reflect the clear views of voters. For instance, the current Australian government was supported by less than one third of voters – probably far less now.  Democracy is not meant to work that way. It will be necessary for the new party, or new coalition, to field candidates in every electorate in the next election to optimise the likelihood of their winning a clear majority.

If all these candidates, including those from existing major and minor parties as well as independents, form a new party, join one existing minor party or form a coalition, and then agree to field only one candidate for each electorate, they will likely win a majority in both houses. This new party or coalition, both leaders and all candidates, should assess and improve the proposed structure and governance and produce a new comprehensive vision, strategy and operational plan that all candidates fully understand and support, and that will convince the majority of voters to vote for a candidate who promises to implement fully the vision, strategy and plan as soon as possible.

This proposal describes 23 changed areas of government and governance, preceded by a vision for the Australian government. All 23 areas and the vision are interconnected and, together, will lead to massive improvements in every aspect of almost all Australians’ lives, to an Australia we can all be proud of, a model for every country in the world to adopt. No timeline is set; just asap.

The 23 areas are:

1. The new Australian Vision will overarch all government action
2. Australia will implement Direct Democracy
3. The Australian Constitution will be reviewed
4. Australia will be neutral
5. The Australian Military will reflect neutrality
6. Councils will take over all state and territory functions
7. All laws will be reviewed for compliance with new governance
8. Elections will be by paper voting forms only with rigorous oversight
9. The government will manage Australian financial affairs
10. Infrastructure will be fully owned by Australians
11. All taxes will be replaced by a single GST on non-essential items
12. Electricity will be provided at the lowest practical cost
13. Compulsory audits of government and council efficiency & effectiveness
14. Regulations & licences will be reviewed for compliance with governance
15. Immigration will be aligned with planned growth
16. Australia will have short- and long-term growth plans
17. All education will return to the basics and fact-based information
18. Impediments to freedom of speech will be removed
19. All Australian people will be treated as equals
20. Plans for digital ID will be put on hold
21. Councils will pay retirement and welfare benefits
22. All health and related services will be based on proven benefits
23. Environment management will be based on proven benefits to Australians
24. A research group will assess dubious information

Every point proposed in the 23 areas could be implemented if the majority of Australians and the government approve them.  It is not a question of ‘it can’t be done’; it can, likely with some improvements to these proposals.  But are enough people and future politicians prepared to stand up and be counted?  Stand up for what is clearly far better for the great majority of them?

However, and this is a critical point, the proposals in the 24 areas cover hundreds of aspects that the great majority of people will either struggle with or initially outright reject because they are contrary to what most people have been taught or, more accurately, indoctrinated for most of their lives; the initial reaction from most people is likely to be they are just too different and require too much thinking and discussion. It will therefore be vital that the new party understands the full eventual scope of the proposal, but introduces some of the interconnected details gradually at a pace that most people can absorb and not be turned off by the sheer enormity and interconnectedness of the proposed changes.

The majority of people have been deliberately and consistently indoctrinated from birth with so much misinformation that they are likely to vote against a government candidate who is proposing solutions that are genuinely in the voter’s best interests. If that sounds like a conspiracy theory, do your homework and always ask three questions: cui bono (who stands to gain)? Is there credible evidence supporting the view? Is it part of the anti-humanist New World Order agenda? A good starting point is to watch this video to the end: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFHHOBiUrkg. You will probably find the truth uncomfortable, but democracy doesn’t work if voters are misinformed and fails to protect the rights of minorities, as Socrates found out. Watch too this video by Prof Mearsheimer explaining how the current world order, the world driven by the US, UK and Zionists, is failing fast clinging to hegemony, whilst being replaced by a multi-polar world based on peace, moral realism, trade, co-existence and honesty: NATO’S WORST NIGHTMARE — Russia’s Next Move Shocks the World| Mearsheimer responds . Will the West listen before it’s too late? Australia has that chance if it changes most of its government and governance.